Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism calls for improved due process in Al Qaida sanctions regime
Nov 16, 2012 11:03 am
View article online
Nov 16, 2012 11:03 am
View article online
On 2 November 2012, the Special Rapporteur on human rights and
counter-terrorism, Mr Ben Emmerson, presented his second report
(A/67/396) to the General Assembly’s Third Committee.[1]
The Special Rapporteur's statement focused on the need for the Security
Council to align its Al Qaida sanctions regime with international human
rights law norms, most notably minimum standards of due process. In
particular, he recommended amending the mandate of the Office of the
Ombudsperson,[2]
which investigates removal requests regarding individuals and entities
from the sanctions list. Though the Ombudsman role was created in 2009
to enhance due process protections, it continues to have many
weaknesses. These include that States are under no obligation to
disclose information to the Ombudsperson, and that the Ombudsperson has
had significant difficulty in obtaining sensitive information. In
addition, adverse judicial rulings, in particular by the European Court
of Human Rights, have undercut the perceived legitimacy of the sanctions
regime and its ability to enforce its decisions.
In the Special Rapporteur's view, the Council should, under Chapter VII
powers, establish an independent adjudicator with jurisdiction to
review and overturn a designation by the Committee. Such a regime would
be different from the former one as it would require the Security
Council to abide by the recommendations of the Ombudsperson.
Eight countries contributed to the dialogue, which centered on the
effectiveness of the sanctions regime since its inception in 1999.
Mexico and Pakistan inquired whether some of the recommendations could
be applied to other sanction cases and regimes. The Special Rapportuer
noted that he had focused on the Al-Qaida regime as it had been the
target of sustained legal challenges.
The European Union (EU), Liechtenstein, the United States (US) and the
United Kingdom (UK) all praised the improvements in the sanctions regime
since 1998. However, they questioned the Special Rapporteur’s
assessment that current due process procedures fall short of
international human rights law. In their view, the Ombudsperson process
is robust, and operates with respect to the fundamental aspects of due
process.
Iran raised the issue of targeted killings, and asked if the Special
Rapporteur would take the topic up in future studies. The Special
Rapportuer said his next report to the Human Rights Council would review
the minimum international standards related to the accountability of
public officials who had collaborated with a torture-rendering State.
He also mentioned that he had begun a study on the use of drones, which
he would present to the General Assembly in 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment